Correlation Between Microsoft and Convenience Foods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Convenience Foods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Convenience Foods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Convenience Foods PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Convenience Foods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Convenience Foods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Convenience Foods.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Convenience Foods

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Convenience is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Convenience Foods PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Convenience Foods PLC and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Convenience Foods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Convenience Foods PLC has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Convenience Foods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Convenience Foods

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to under-perform the Convenience Foods. In addition to that, Microsoft is 1.34 times more volatile than Convenience Foods PLC. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Convenience Foods PLC is currently generating about 0.33 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  82,325  in Convenience Foods PLC on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,125  from holding Convenience Foods PLC or generate 8.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy90.91%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Convenience Foods PLC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Convenience Foods PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Convenience Foods PLC are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Convenience Foods sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and Convenience Foods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Convenience Foods

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Convenience Foods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Convenience Foods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Convenience Foods will offset losses from the drop in Convenience Foods' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Convenience Foods PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA