Correlation Between Microsoft and ATMOS
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and ATMOS ENERGY P, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and ATMOS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of ATMOS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and ATMOS.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and ATMOS
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and ATMOS is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and ATMOS ENERGY P in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ATMOS ENERGY P and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with ATMOS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ATMOS ENERGY P has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and ATMOS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and ATMOS
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 2.19 times more return on investment than ATMOS. However, Microsoft is 2.19 times more volatile than ATMOS ENERGY P. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ATMOS ENERGY P is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 43,167 in Microsoft on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (868.00) from holding Microsoft or give up 2.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. ATMOS ENERGY P
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Microsoft |
| ATMOS ENERGY P |
Microsoft and ATMOS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and ATMOS
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and ATMOS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, ATMOS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ATMOS will offset losses from the drop in ATMOS's long position.| Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
| ATMOS vs. AEP TEX INC | ATMOS vs. US BANK NATIONAL | ATMOS vs. International Business Machines | ATMOS vs. Intel |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |