Correlation Between Microsoft and GLOBAL
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and GLOBAL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of GLOBAL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and GLOBAL.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and GLOBAL
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and GLOBAL is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with GLOBAL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and GLOBAL go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and GLOBAL
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.7 times more return on investment than GLOBAL. However, Microsoft is 1.42 times less risky than GLOBAL. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest 40,955 in Microsoft on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,391 from holding Microsoft or generate 3.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC |
Microsoft and GLOBAL Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and GLOBAL
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and GLOBAL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, GLOBAL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GLOBAL will offset losses from the drop in GLOBAL's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
GLOBAL vs. Skillful Craftsman Education | GLOBAL vs. AMCON Distributing | GLOBAL vs. SunOpta | GLOBAL vs. Where Food Comes |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |