Correlation Between Microsoft and WR Berkley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and WR Berkley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and WR Berkley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and WR Berkley, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and WR Berkley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of WR Berkley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and WR Berkley.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and WR Berkley

0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and WRB-PH is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and WR Berkley in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on WR Berkley and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with WR Berkley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of WR Berkley has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and WR Berkley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and WR Berkley

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.71 times more return on investment than WR Berkley. However, Microsoft is 1.71 times more volatile than WR Berkley. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. WR Berkley is currently generating about -0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest  43,167  in Microsoft on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (868.00) from holding Microsoft or give up 2.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  WR Berkley

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
WR Berkley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days WR Berkley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong fundamental drivers, WR Berkley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Microsoft and WR Berkley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and WR Berkley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and WR Berkley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, WR Berkley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in WR Berkley will offset losses from the drop in WR Berkley's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and WR Berkley pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas