Correlation Between Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Nebraska Municipal Fund and Columbia Large Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Nebraska Municipal with a short position of Columbia Large. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large.

Diversification Opportunities for Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large

-0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Nebraska and Columbia is -0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Nebraska Municipal Fund and Columbia Large Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Large Cap and Nebraska Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Nebraska Municipal Fund are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Large. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Large Cap has no effect on the direction of Nebraska Municipal i.e., Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large

Assuming the 90 days horizon Nebraska Municipal is expected to generate 9.48 times less return on investment than Columbia Large. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Nebraska Municipal Fund is 3.68 times less risky than Columbia Large. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Large Cap is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,626  in Columbia Large Cap on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  361.00  from holding Columbia Large Cap or generate 13.75% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.94%
ValuesDaily Returns

Nebraska Municipal Fund  vs.  Columbia Large Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Nebraska Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nebraska Municipal Fund are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Nebraska Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Large Cap 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Large Cap are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Large may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large

The main advantage of trading using opposite Nebraska Municipal and Columbia Large positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Nebraska Municipal position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Large can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Large will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Large's long position.
The idea behind Nebraska Municipal Fund and Columbia Large Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments