Correlation Between Insurance Australia and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Insurance Australia and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Insurance Australia and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Insurance Australia Group and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Insurance Australia and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Insurance Australia with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Insurance Australia and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for Insurance Australia and China Communications
0.02 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Insurance and China is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Insurance Australia Group and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and Insurance Australia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Insurance Australia Group are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of Insurance Australia i.e., Insurance Australia and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Insurance Australia and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days horizon Insurance Australia Group is expected to generate 1.71 times more return on investment than China Communications. However, Insurance Australia is 1.71 times more volatile than China Communications Services. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 444.00 in Insurance Australia Group on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 66.00 from holding Insurance Australia Group or generate 14.86% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Insurance Australia Group vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Insurance Australia |
| China Communications |
Insurance Australia and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Insurance Australia and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite Insurance Australia and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Insurance Australia position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.| Insurance Australia vs. T MOBILE US | Insurance Australia vs. HomeToGo SE | Insurance Australia vs. Iridium Communications | Insurance Australia vs. RYU Apparel |
| China Communications vs. ATT Inc | China Communications vs. Deutsche Telekom AG | China Communications vs. Superior Plus Corp | China Communications vs. NMI Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format |