Correlation Between Performance Food and Morgan Stanley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Performance Food and Morgan Stanley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Performance Food and Morgan Stanley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Performance Food Group and Morgan Stanley, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Performance Food and Morgan Stanley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Performance Food with a short position of Morgan Stanley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Performance Food and Morgan Stanley.

Diversification Opportunities for Performance Food and Morgan Stanley

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Performance and Morgan is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Performance Food Group and Morgan Stanley in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Morgan Stanley and Performance Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Performance Food Group are associated (or correlated) with Morgan Stanley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Morgan Stanley has no effect on the direction of Performance Food i.e., Performance Food and Morgan Stanley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Performance Food and Morgan Stanley

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Performance Food is expected to generate 1.46 times less return on investment than Morgan Stanley. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Performance Food Group is 2.27 times less risky than Morgan Stanley. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Morgan Stanley is currently generating about 0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  10,708  in Morgan Stanley on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,804  from holding Morgan Stanley or generate 16.85% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Performance Food Group  vs.  Morgan Stanley

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Performance Food 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Performance Food Group are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, Performance Food unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Morgan Stanley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Morgan Stanley reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Performance Food and Morgan Stanley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Performance Food and Morgan Stanley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Performance Food and Morgan Stanley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Performance Food position performs unexpectedly, Morgan Stanley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Morgan Stanley will offset losses from the drop in Morgan Stanley's long position.
The idea behind Performance Food Group and Morgan Stanley pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data