Correlation Between Bank Central and Greenville Federal

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank Central and Greenville Federal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank Central and Greenville Federal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank Central Asia and Greenville Federal Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank Central and Greenville Federal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank Central with a short position of Greenville Federal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank Central and Greenville Federal.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank Central and Greenville Federal

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Greenville is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank Central Asia and Greenville Federal Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Greenville Federal and Bank Central is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank Central Asia are associated (or correlated) with Greenville Federal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Greenville Federal has no effect on the direction of Bank Central i.e., Bank Central and Greenville Federal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank Central and Greenville Federal

Assuming the 90 days horizon Bank Central Asia is expected to generate 0.48 times more return on investment than Greenville Federal. However, Bank Central Asia is 2.1 times less risky than Greenville Federal. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Greenville Federal Financial is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,353  in Bank Central Asia on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  207.00  from holding Bank Central Asia or generate 15.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank Central Asia  vs.  Greenville Federal Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank Central Asia 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bank Central Asia has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Bank Central is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Greenville Federal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Greenville Federal Financial are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Greenville Federal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Bank Central and Greenville Federal Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank Central and Greenville Federal

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank Central and Greenville Federal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank Central position performs unexpectedly, Greenville Federal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Greenville Federal will offset losses from the drop in Greenville Federal's long position.
The idea behind Bank Central Asia and Greenville Federal Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets