Correlation Between PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Floating Rate and Aspen Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Floating with a short position of Aspen Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance

0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Aspen is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Floating Rate and Aspen Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings and PennantPark Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Aspen Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspen Insurance Holdings has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Floating i.e., PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance

Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Floating is expected to generate 7.81 times less return on investment than Aspen Insurance. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, PennantPark Floating Rate is 1.48 times less risky than Aspen Insurance. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aspen Insurance Holdings is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,068  in Aspen Insurance Holdings on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  84.00  from holding Aspen Insurance Holdings or generate 4.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

PennantPark Floating Rate  vs.  Aspen Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
PennantPark Floating Rate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Over the last 90 days PennantPark Floating Rate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable essential indicators, PennantPark Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aspen Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Floating and Aspen Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Floating position performs unexpectedly, Aspen Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspen Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Aspen Insurance's long position.
The idea behind PennantPark Floating Rate and Aspen Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated