Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Celestica

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Celestica at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Celestica into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Celestica, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Celestica and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Celestica. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Celestica.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Celestica

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Celestica is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Celestica in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Celestica and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Celestica. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Celestica has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Celestica go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Celestica

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.39 times less return on investment than Celestica. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 2.81 times less risky than Celestica. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Celestica is currently generating about 0.27 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,978  in Celestica on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,338  from holding Celestica or generate 19.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Celestica

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Celestica 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Celestica are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain essential indicators, Celestica unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Celestica Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Celestica

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Celestica positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Celestica can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Celestica will offset losses from the drop in Celestica's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Celestica pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities