Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Calvert Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging

-0.48
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Calvert is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Emerging Markets and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 1.28 times more return on investment than Calvert Emerging. However, Procter Gamble is 1.28 times more volatile than Calvert Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,518  in Procter Gamble on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,408  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 8.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Calvert Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Calvert Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Calvert Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Calvert Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios