Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Steward Covered

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Steward Covered at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Steward Covered into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Steward Ered Call, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Steward Covered and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Steward Covered. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Steward Covered.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Steward Covered

0.72
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Steward is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Steward Ered Call in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Steward Ered Call and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Steward Covered. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Steward Ered Call has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Steward Covered go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Steward Covered

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 3.1 times more return on investment than Steward Covered. However, Procter Gamble is 3.1 times more volatile than Steward Ered Call. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Steward Ered Call is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,966  in Procter Gamble on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  88.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 0.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Steward Ered Call

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Steward Ered Call 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Steward Ered Call has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Steward Covered is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Steward Covered Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Steward Covered

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Steward Covered positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Steward Covered can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Steward Covered will offset losses from the drop in Steward Covered's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Steward Ered Call pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets