Correlation Between Procter Gamble and MARKEL
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and MARKEL P 43, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and MARKEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of MARKEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and MARKEL.
Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and MARKEL
-0.42 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Procter and MARKEL is -0.42. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and MARKEL P 43 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MARKEL P 43 and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with MARKEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MARKEL P 43 has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and MARKEL go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and MARKEL
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.79 times more return on investment than MARKEL. However, Procter Gamble is 1.27 times less risky than MARKEL. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MARKEL P 43 is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 15,643 in Procter Gamble on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,283 from holding Procter Gamble or generate 14.59% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 29.26% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Procter Gamble vs. MARKEL P 43
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Procter Gamble |
| MARKEL P 43 |
Procter Gamble and MARKEL Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and MARKEL
The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and MARKEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, MARKEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MARKEL will offset losses from the drop in MARKEL's long position.| Procter Gamble vs. Colgate Palmolive | Procter Gamble vs. Unilever PLC ADR | Procter Gamble vs. Kimberly Clark | Procter Gamble vs. Estee Lauder Companies |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules |