Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Zebra Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Zebra is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zebra Technologies and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Zebra Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zebra Technologies has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.86 times more return on investment than Zebra Technologies. However, Procter Gamble is 1.17 times less risky than Zebra Technologies. It trades about 0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zebra Technologies is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,616  in Procter Gamble on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,320  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 7.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Zebra Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Zebra Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zebra Technologies are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unfluctuating basic indicators, Zebra Technologies sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Zebra Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zebra Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Zebra Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and Zebra Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world