Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Natura Co

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Natura Co at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Natura Co into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Natura Co Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Natura Co and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Natura Co. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Natura Co.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Natura Co

-0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Natura is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Natura Co Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Natura Co Holding and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Natura Co. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Natura Co Holding has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Natura Co go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Natura Co

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon The Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.54 times more return on investment than Natura Co. However, The Procter Gamble is 1.86 times less risky than Natura Co. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Natura Co Holding is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,338  in The Procter Gamble on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,362  from holding The Procter Gamble or generate 44.25% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.99%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Natura Co Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Natura Co Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Natura Co Holding are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Natura Co is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Procter Gamble and Natura Co Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Natura Co

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Natura Co positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Natura Co can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Natura Co will offset losses from the drop in Natura Co's long position.
The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Natura Co Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas