Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Fino Payments

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Fino Payments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Fino Payments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble Health and Fino Payments Bank, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Fino Payments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Fino Payments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Fino Payments.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Fino Payments

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Fino is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble Health and Fino Payments Bank in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fino Payments Bank and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble Health are associated (or correlated) with Fino Payments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fino Payments Bank has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Fino Payments go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Fino Payments

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble Health is expected to generate 0.84 times more return on investment than Fino Payments. However, Procter Gamble Health is 1.18 times less risky than Fino Payments. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fino Payments Bank is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  517,205  in Procter Gamble Health on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  500.00  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 0.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble Health  vs.  Fino Payments Bank

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Fino Payments Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Fino Payments Bank has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Fino Payments is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Fino Payments Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Fino Payments

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Fino Payments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Fino Payments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fino Payments will offset losses from the drop in Fino Payments' long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble Health and Fino Payments Bank pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance