Correlation Between Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pgim Jennison Technology and Mfs Technology Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pgim Jennison with a short position of Mfs Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Pgim and Mfs is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pgim Jennison Technology and Mfs Technology Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Technology and Pgim Jennison is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pgim Jennison Technology are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Technology has no effect on the direction of Pgim Jennison i.e., Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology

Assuming the 90 days horizon Pgim Jennison Technology is expected to generate 1.21 times more return on investment than Mfs Technology. However, Pgim Jennison is 1.21 times more volatile than Mfs Technology Fund. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Technology Fund is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,330  in Pgim Jennison Technology on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,306  from holding Pgim Jennison Technology or generate 98.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy99.78%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pgim Jennison Technology  vs.  Mfs Technology Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pgim Jennison Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pgim Jennison Technology are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Pgim Jennison showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Mfs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Technology Fund are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak essential indicators, Mfs Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pgim Jennison and Mfs Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pgim Jennison position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Technology will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Technology's long position.
The idea behind Pgim Jennison Technology and Mfs Technology Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets