Correlation Between Penn National and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and Verizon Communications, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and Bank of America

0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and Bank is 0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and Verizon Communications in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Verizon Communications and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Verizon Communications has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days horizon Penn National Gaming is expected to under-perform the Bank of America. In addition to that, Penn National is 2.49 times more volatile than Verizon Communications. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Verizon Communications is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,167  in Verizon Communications on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  838.00  from holding Verizon Communications or generate 26.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  Verizon Communications

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Penn National may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Verizon Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Penn National and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Penn National and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind Penn National Gaming and Verizon Communications pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings