Correlation Between Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pine Cliff Energy and Prairie Provident Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pine Cliff with a short position of Prairie Provident. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident.

Diversification Opportunities for Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident

0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pine and Prairie is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pine Cliff Energy and Prairie Provident Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Prairie Provident and Pine Cliff is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pine Cliff Energy are associated (or correlated) with Prairie Provident. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Prairie Provident has no effect on the direction of Pine Cliff i.e., Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Pine Cliff Energy is expected to under-perform the Prairie Provident. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Pine Cliff Energy is 3.99 times less risky than Prairie Provident. The stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Prairie Provident Resources is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8.00  in Prairie Provident Resources on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5.00) from holding Prairie Provident Resources or give up 62.5% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pine Cliff Energy  vs.  Prairie Provident Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pine Cliff Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Pine Cliff Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, Pine Cliff is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Prairie Provident 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Prairie Provident Resources are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Prairie Provident displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pine Cliff and Prairie Provident positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pine Cliff position performs unexpectedly, Prairie Provident can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Prairie Provident will offset losses from the drop in Prairie Provident's long position.
The idea behind Pine Cliff Energy and Prairie Provident Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.