Correlation Between Power and Big Pharma

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Power and Big Pharma at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Power and Big Pharma into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Power and Big Pharma Split, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Power and Big Pharma and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Power with a short position of Big Pharma. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Power and Big Pharma.

Diversification Opportunities for Power and Big Pharma

-0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Power and Big is -0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Power and Big Pharma Split in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Big Pharma Split and Power is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Power are associated (or correlated) with Big Pharma. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Big Pharma Split has no effect on the direction of Power i.e., Power and Big Pharma go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Power and Big Pharma

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Power is expected to generate 0.9 times more return on investment than Big Pharma. However, Power is 1.11 times less risky than Big Pharma. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Big Pharma Split is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,492  in Power on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,158  from holding Power or generate 33.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Power  vs.  Big Pharma Split

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Power 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Power are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Power may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Big Pharma Split 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Big Pharma Split has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.

Power and Big Pharma Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Power and Big Pharma

The main advantage of trading using opposite Power and Big Pharma positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Power position performs unexpectedly, Big Pharma can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Big Pharma will offset losses from the drop in Big Pharma's long position.
The idea behind Power and Big Pharma Split pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities