Correlation Between Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial Mines, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Rochester Resources with a short position of Pacific Imperial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial.

Diversification Opportunities for Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Rochester and Pacific is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial Mines in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Pacific Imperial Mines and Rochester Resources is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Rochester Resources are associated (or correlated) with Pacific Imperial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Pacific Imperial Mines has no effect on the direction of Rochester Resources i.e., Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial

Assuming the 90 days horizon Rochester Resources is expected to generate 1.11 times less return on investment than Pacific Imperial. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Rochester Resources is 1.11 times less risky than Pacific Imperial. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Pacific Imperial Mines is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.00  in Pacific Imperial Mines on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.00) from holding Pacific Imperial Mines or give up 50.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Rochester Resources  vs.  Pacific Imperial Mines

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Rochester Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Rochester Resources has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Rochester Resources is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.
Pacific Imperial Mines 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pacific Imperial Mines are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Pacific Imperial showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Rochester Resources position performs unexpectedly, Pacific Imperial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pacific Imperial will offset losses from the drop in Pacific Imperial's long position.
The idea behind Rochester Resources and Pacific Imperial Mines pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation