Correlation Between Energy Fund and Precious Metals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Fund and Precious Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Fund and Precious Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Fund Investor and Precious Metals Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Fund and Precious Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Fund with a short position of Precious Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Fund and Precious Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Fund and Precious Metals

0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Precious is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Fund Investor and Precious Metals Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Precious Metals and Energy Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Fund Investor are associated (or correlated) with Precious Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Precious Metals has no effect on the direction of Energy Fund i.e., Energy Fund and Precious Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Fund and Precious Metals

Assuming the 90 days horizon Energy Fund is expected to generate 102.67 times less return on investment than Precious Metals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Energy Fund Investor is 1.43 times less risky than Precious Metals. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Precious Metals Fund is currently generating about 0.4 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,894  in Precious Metals Fund on November 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  553.00  from holding Precious Metals Fund or generate 14.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Fund Investor  vs.  Precious Metals Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Energy Fund Investor has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Energy Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Precious Metals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Precious Metals Fund are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Precious Metals is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Energy Fund and Precious Metals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Fund and Precious Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Fund and Precious Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Fund position performs unexpectedly, Precious Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Precious Metals will offset losses from the drop in Precious Metals' long position.
The idea behind Energy Fund Investor and Precious Metals Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets