Correlation Between Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Clearbridge Aggressive Growth and Franklin Small Mid Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Clearbridge Aggressive with a short position of Franklin Small-mid. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid.

Diversification Opportunities for Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid

0.99
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Clearbridge and Franklin is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Clearbridge Aggressive Growth and Franklin Small Mid Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin Small Mid and Clearbridge Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Clearbridge Aggressive Growth are associated (or correlated) with Franklin Small-mid. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin Small Mid has no effect on the direction of Clearbridge Aggressive i.e., Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid

Assuming the 90 days horizon Clearbridge Aggressive is expected to generate 1.23 times less return on investment than Franklin Small-mid. In addition to that, Clearbridge Aggressive is 1.08 times more volatile than Franklin Small Mid Cap. It trades about 0.31 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin Small Mid Cap is currently generating about 0.41 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,515  in Franklin Small Mid Cap on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  435.00  from holding Franklin Small Mid Cap or generate 9.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Clearbridge Aggressive Growth  vs.  Franklin Small Mid Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Clearbridge Aggressive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clearbridge Aggressive Growth are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Clearbridge Aggressive may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Franklin Small Mid 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Franklin Small Mid Cap are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Franklin Small-mid showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid

The main advantage of trading using opposite Clearbridge Aggressive and Franklin Small-mid positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Clearbridge Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Franklin Small-mid can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin Small-mid will offset losses from the drop in Franklin Small-mid's long position.
The idea behind Clearbridge Aggressive Growth and Franklin Small Mid Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets