Correlation Between Financial Services and Financial Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financial Services and Financial Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financial Services and Financial Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financial Services Portfolio and Financial Services Portfolio, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financial Services and Financial Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financial Services with a short position of Financial Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financial Services and Financial Services.

Diversification Opportunities for Financial Services and Financial Services

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Financial and Financial is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financial Services Portfolio and Financial Services Portfolio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Financial Services and Financial Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financial Services Portfolio are associated (or correlated) with Financial Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Financial Services has no effect on the direction of Financial Services i.e., Financial Services and Financial Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Financial Services and Financial Services

Assuming the 90 days horizon Financial Services is expected to generate 1.36 times less return on investment than Financial Services. In addition to that, Financial Services is 1.02 times more volatile than Financial Services Portfolio. It trades about 0.17 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Financial Services Portfolio is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,058  in Financial Services Portfolio on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  92.00  from holding Financial Services Portfolio or generate 8.7% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Financial Services Portfolio  vs.  Financial Services Portfolio

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Portfolio are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financial Services showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Portfolio are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Financial Services showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Financial Services and Financial Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Financial Services and Financial Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite Financial Services and Financial Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financial Services position performs unexpectedly, Financial Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial Services will offset losses from the drop in Financial Services' long position.
The idea behind Financial Services Portfolio and Financial Services Portfolio pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas