Correlation Between Solid Impact and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Solid Impact and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Solid Impact and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Solid Impact Investments and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Solid Impact and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Solid Impact with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Solid Impact and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Solid Impact and Maple Leaf

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Solid and Maple is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Solid Impact Investments and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Solid Impact is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Solid Impact Investments are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Solid Impact i.e., Solid Impact and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Solid Impact and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Solid Impact Investments is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. In addition to that, Solid Impact is 1.59 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about -0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,303  in Maple Leaf Foods on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (43.00) from holding Maple Leaf Foods or give up 1.87% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Solid Impact Investments  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Solid Impact Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Solid Impact Investments has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Solid Impact is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Solid Impact and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Solid Impact and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Solid Impact and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Solid Impact position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Solid Impact Investments and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins