Correlation Between Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Sarepta Therapeutics with a short position of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals.

Diversification Opportunities for Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

-0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Sarepta and ACADIA is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ACADIA Pharmaceuticals and Sarepta Therapeutics is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Sarepta Therapeutics are associated (or correlated) with ACADIA Pharmaceuticals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has no effect on the direction of Sarepta Therapeutics i.e., Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Sarepta Therapeutics is expected to generate 1.2 times more return on investment than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals. However, Sarepta Therapeutics is 1.2 times more volatile than ACADIA Pharmaceuticals. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  13,510  in Sarepta Therapeutics on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  284.00  from holding Sarepta Therapeutics or generate 2.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Sarepta Therapeutics  vs.  ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Sarepta Therapeutics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sarepta Therapeutics are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Sarepta Therapeutics is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ACADIA Pharmaceuticals has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Sarepta Therapeutics position performs unexpectedly, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals will offset losses from the drop in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals' long position.
The idea behind Sarepta Therapeutics and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.