Correlation Between Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC

-0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and BUILDERS is -0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to under-perform the BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC. In addition to that, Scientific Games is 1.32 times more volatile than BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  16,640  in BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (10.00) from holding BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC or give up 0.06% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Scientific Games is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC will offset losses from the drop in BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC's long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and BUILDERS FIRSTSOURC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.