Correlation Between Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Touchstone Premium Yield and Oppenheimer Global Strtgc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Touchstone Premium with a short position of Oppenheimer Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Touchstone and Oppenheimer is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Touchstone Premium Yield and Oppenheimer Global Strtgc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oppenheimer Global Strtgc and Touchstone Premium is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Touchstone Premium Yield are associated (or correlated) with Oppenheimer Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oppenheimer Global Strtgc has no effect on the direction of Touchstone Premium i.e., Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Touchstone Premium Yield is expected to generate 2.53 times more return on investment than Oppenheimer Global. However, Touchstone Premium is 2.53 times more volatile than Oppenheimer Global Strtgc. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oppenheimer Global Strtgc is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  742.00  in Touchstone Premium Yield on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  172.00  from holding Touchstone Premium Yield or generate 23.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Touchstone Premium Yield  vs.  Oppenheimer Global Strtgc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Touchstone Premium Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Touchstone Premium Yield are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Touchstone Premium is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Oppenheimer Global Strtgc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Oppenheimer Global Strtgc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Oppenheimer Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Touchstone Premium and Oppenheimer Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Touchstone Premium position performs unexpectedly, Oppenheimer Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oppenheimer Global will offset losses from the drop in Oppenheimer Global's long position.
The idea behind Touchstone Premium Yield and Oppenheimer Global Strtgc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets