Correlation Between Tree House and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Tree House and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Tree House and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Tree House Education and Procter Gamble Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Tree House and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Tree House with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Tree House and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Tree House and Procter Gamble

0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Tree and Procter is 0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Tree House Education and Procter Gamble Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble Health and Tree House is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Tree House Education are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble Health has no effect on the direction of Tree House i.e., Tree House and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Tree House and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Tree House Education is expected to generate 1.53 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Tree House is 1.53 times more volatile than Procter Gamble Health. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble Health is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,675  in Tree House Education on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  289.00  from holding Tree House Education or generate 17.25% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Tree House Education  vs.  Procter Gamble Health

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Tree House Education 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Tree House Education has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Tree House is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Procter Gamble Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Tree House and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Tree House and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Tree House and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Tree House position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Tree House Education and Procter Gamble Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories