Correlation Between Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Aggressive and Columbia Balanced Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation with a short position of Columbia Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced

0.53
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Columbia is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Aggressiv and Columbia Balanced Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Balanced and Strategic Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Aggressive are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Balanced has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation i.e., Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation is expected to generate 1.13 times less return on investment than Columbia Balanced. In addition to that, Strategic Allocation is 1.09 times more volatile than Columbia Balanced Fund. It trades about 0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Balanced Fund is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  3,916  in Columbia Balanced Fund on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,336  from holding Columbia Balanced Fund or generate 34.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Strategic Allocation Aggressiv  vs.  Columbia Balanced Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Strategic Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Allocation Aggressive are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Columbia Balanced Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation and Columbia Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Balanced's long position.
The idea behind Strategic Allocation Aggressive and Columbia Balanced Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.