Correlation Between United Natural and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both United Natural and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining United Natural and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between United Natural Foods and Bank of America, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on United Natural and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in United Natural with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of United Natural and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for United Natural and Bank of America

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between United and Bank is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding United Natural Foods and Bank of America in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of America and United Natural is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on United Natural Foods are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of America has no effect on the direction of United Natural i.e., United Natural and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between United Natural and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days horizon United Natural Foods is expected to generate 1.23 times more return on investment than Bank of America. However, United Natural is 1.23 times more volatile than Bank of America. It trades about 0.34 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of America is currently generating about 0.32 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,888  in United Natural Foods on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  402.00  from holding United Natural Foods or generate 21.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

United Natural Foods  vs.  Bank of America

 Performance 
       Timeline  
United Natural Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in United Natural Foods are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, United Natural reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of America are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile fundamental drivers, Bank of America unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

United Natural and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with United Natural and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite United Natural and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if United Natural position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind United Natural Foods and Bank of America pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios