Correlation Between Washington Federal and First Foundation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Washington Federal and First Foundation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Washington Federal and First Foundation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Washington Federal and First Foundation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Washington Federal and First Foundation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Washington Federal with a short position of First Foundation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Washington Federal and First Foundation.

Diversification Opportunities for Washington Federal and First Foundation

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Washington and First is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Washington Federal and First Foundation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on First Foundation and Washington Federal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Washington Federal are associated (or correlated) with First Foundation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of First Foundation has no effect on the direction of Washington Federal i.e., Washington Federal and First Foundation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Washington Federal and First Foundation

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Washington Federal is expected to generate 2.06 times less return on investment than First Foundation. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Washington Federal is 1.45 times less risky than First Foundation. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. First Foundation is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  673.00  in First Foundation on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  122.00  from holding First Foundation or generate 18.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Washington Federal  vs.  First Foundation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Washington Federal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Washington Federal are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Washington Federal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
First Foundation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in First Foundation are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, First Foundation displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Washington Federal and First Foundation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Washington Federal and First Foundation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Washington Federal and First Foundation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Washington Federal position performs unexpectedly, First Foundation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in First Foundation will offset losses from the drop in First Foundation's long position.
The idea behind Washington Federal and First Foundation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance