Correlation Between Washington Federal and First Foundation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Washington Federal and First Foundation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Washington Federal and First Foundation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Washington Federal and First Foundation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Washington Federal and First Foundation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Washington Federal with a short position of First Foundation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Washington Federal and First Foundation.

Diversification Opportunities for Washington Federal and First Foundation

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Washington and First is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Washington Federal and First Foundation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on First Foundation and Washington Federal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Washington Federal are associated (or correlated) with First Foundation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of First Foundation has no effect on the direction of Washington Federal i.e., Washington Federal and First Foundation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Washington Federal and First Foundation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Washington Federal is expected to under-perform the First Foundation. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Washington Federal is 3.07 times less risky than First Foundation. The preferred stock trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The First Foundation is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  673.00  in First Foundation on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  122.00  from holding First Foundation or generate 18.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Washington Federal  vs.  First Foundation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Washington Federal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Washington Federal are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable fundamental indicators, Washington Federal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
First Foundation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in First Foundation are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, First Foundation displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Washington Federal and First Foundation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Washington Federal and First Foundation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Washington Federal and First Foundation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Washington Federal position performs unexpectedly, First Foundation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in First Foundation will offset losses from the drop in First Foundation's long position.
The idea behind Washington Federal and First Foundation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets