Correlation Between Waste Management and Aspen Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Waste Management and Aspen Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Waste Management and Aspen Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Waste Management and Aspen Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Waste Management and Aspen Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Waste Management with a short position of Aspen Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Waste Management and Aspen Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Waste Management and Aspen Insurance

0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Waste and Aspen is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Waste Management and Aspen Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings and Waste Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Waste Management are associated (or correlated) with Aspen Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspen Insurance Holdings has no effect on the direction of Waste Management i.e., Waste Management and Aspen Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Waste Management and Aspen Insurance

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Waste Management is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than Aspen Insurance. However, Waste Management is 1.04 times less risky than Aspen Insurance. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aspen Insurance Holdings is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  21,127  in Waste Management on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,719  from holding Waste Management or generate 8.14% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Waste Management  vs.  Aspen Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Waste Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Waste Management are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, Waste Management may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aspen Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Waste Management and Aspen Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Waste Management and Aspen Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Waste Management and Aspen Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Waste Management position performs unexpectedly, Aspen Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspen Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Aspen Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Waste Management and Aspen Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk