Correlation Between Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Neuberger Berman Intermediate and Aquila Three Peaks, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Neuberger Berman with a short position of Aquila Three. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three.

Diversification Opportunities for Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three

-0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Neuberger and Aquila is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Neuberger Berman Intermediate and Aquila Three Peaks in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aquila Three Peaks and Neuberger Berman is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Neuberger Berman Intermediate are associated (or correlated) with Aquila Three. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aquila Three Peaks has no effect on the direction of Neuberger Berman i.e., Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three

Assuming the 90 days horizon Neuberger Berman is expected to generate 3.77 times less return on investment than Aquila Three. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Neuberger Berman Intermediate is 1.99 times less risky than Aquila Three. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aquila Three Peaks is currently generating about 0.28 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,741  in Aquila Three Peaks on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  144.00  from holding Aquila Three Peaks or generate 5.25% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy90.48%
ValuesDaily Returns

Neuberger Berman Intermediate  vs.  Aquila Three Peaks

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Neuberger Berman Int 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Neuberger Berman Intermediate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, Neuberger Berman is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Aquila Three Peaks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aquila Three Peaks are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Aquila Three may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three

The main advantage of trading using opposite Neuberger Berman and Aquila Three positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Neuberger Berman position performs unexpectedly, Aquila Three can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aquila Three will offset losses from the drop in Aquila Three's long position.
The idea behind Neuberger Berman Intermediate and Aquila Three Peaks pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals