Correlation Between BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between BMO Ultra Short Term and Mackenzie Floating Rate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in BMO Ultra with a short position of Mackenzie Floating. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating.

Diversification Opportunities for BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating

0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between BMO and Mackenzie is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BMO Ultra Short Term and Mackenzie Floating Rate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Floating Rate and BMO Ultra is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on BMO Ultra Short Term are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Floating. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of BMO Ultra i.e., BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon BMO Ultra is expected to generate 3.99 times less return on investment than Mackenzie Floating. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, BMO Ultra Short Term is 4.62 times less risky than Mackenzie Floating. It trades about 0.65 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Floating Rate is currently generating about 0.56 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,700  in Mackenzie Floating Rate on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  24.00  from holding Mackenzie Floating Rate or generate 1.41% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

BMO Ultra Short Term  vs.  Mackenzie Floating Rate

 Performance 
       Timeline  
BMO Ultra Short 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

48 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Excellent
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BMO Ultra Short Term are ranked lower than 48 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, BMO Ultra is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mackenzie Floating Rate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Floating Rate are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating

The main advantage of trading using opposite BMO Ultra and Mackenzie Floating positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if BMO Ultra position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Floating can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Floating will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Floating's long position.
The idea behind BMO Ultra Short Term and Mackenzie Floating Rate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings