Restaurant Brands International Stock Performance
| RSTRF Stock | USD 68.05 0.00 0.00% |
The company holds a Beta of 0.26, which implies not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, Restaurant Brands' returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding Restaurant Brands is expected to be smaller as well. At this point, Restaurant Brands has a negative expected return of -0.0119%. Please make sure to check Restaurant Brands' risk adjusted performance, variance, as well as the relationship between the Variance and kurtosis , to decide if Restaurant Brands performance from the past will be repeated at some point in the near future.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Weakest
Weak | Strong |
Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders. ...more
| Begin Period Cash Flow | 1.6 B | |
| Total Cashflows From Investing Activities | -1.1 B |
Restaurant |
Restaurant Brands Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape
If you would invest 6,870 in Restaurant Brands International on November 5, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (65.00) from holding Restaurant Brands International or give up 0.95% of portfolio value over 90 days. Restaurant Brands International is currently producing negative expected returns and takes up 0.8574% volatility of returns over 90 trading days. Put another way, 7% of traded pink sheets are less volatile than Restaurant, and 99% of all traded equity instruments are likely to generate higher returns over the next 90 trading days. Expected Return |
| Risk |
Restaurant Brands Target Price Odds to finish over Current Price
The tendency of Restaurant Pink Sheet price to converge on an average value over time is a known aspect in finance that investors have used since the beginning of the stock market for forecasting. However, many studies suggest that some traded equity instruments are consistently mispriced before traders' demand and supply correct the spread. One possible conclusion to this anomaly is that these stocks have additional risk, for which investors demand compensation in the form of extra returns.
| Current Price | Horizon | Target Price | Odds to move above the current price in 90 days |
| 68.05 | 90 days | 68.05 | about 83.87 |
Based on a normal probability distribution, the odds of Restaurant Brands to move above the current price in 90 days from now is about 83.87 (This Restaurant Brands International probability density function shows the probability of Restaurant Pink Sheet to fall within a particular range of prices over 90 days) .
Restaurant Brands Price Density |
| Price |
Predictive Modules for Restaurant Brands
There are currently many different techniques concerning forecasting the market as a whole, as well as predicting future values of individual securities such as Restaurant Brands. Regardless of method or technology, however, to accurately forecast the pink sheet market is more a matter of luck rather than a particular technique. Nevertheless, trying to predict the pink sheet market accurately is still an essential part of the overall investment decision process. Using different forecasting techniques and comparing the results might improve your chances of accuracy even though unexpected events may often change the market sentiment and impact your forecasting results.Restaurant Brands Risk Indicators
For the most part, the last 10-20 years have been a very volatile time for the stock market. Restaurant Brands is not an exception. The market had few large corrections towards the Restaurant Brands' value, including both sudden drops in prices as well as massive rallies. These swings have made and broken many portfolios. An investor can limit the violent swings in their portfolio by implementing a hedging strategy designed to limit downside losses. If you hold Restaurant Brands International, one way to have your portfolio be protected is to always look up for changing volatility and market elasticity of Restaurant Brands within the framework of very fundamental risk indicators.α | Alpha over Dow Jones | -0.03 | |
β | Beta against Dow Jones | 0.26 | |
σ | Overall volatility | 1.86 | |
Ir | Information ratio | -0.08 |
Restaurant Brands Alerts and Suggestions
In today's market, stock alerts give investors the competitive edge they need to time the market and increase returns. Checking the ongoing alerts of Restaurant Brands for significant developments is a great way to find new opportunities for your next move. Suggestions and notifications for Restaurant Brands can help investors quickly react to important events or material changes in technical or fundamental conditions and significant headlines that can affect investment decisions.| Restaurant Brands generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| Restaurant Brands International has accumulated 12.92 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 3.71, implying the company greatly relies on financing operations through barrowing. Restaurant Brands has a current ratio of 0.87, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Restaurant Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Restaurant Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Restaurant Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Restaurant to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Restaurant Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity. | |
| Over 93.0% of Restaurant Brands shares are owned by institutional investors |
Restaurant Brands Price Density Drivers
Market volatility will typically increase when nervous long traders begin to feel the short-sellers pressure to drive the market lower. The future price of Restaurant Pink Sheet often depends not only on the future outlook of the current and potential Restaurant Brands' investors but also on the ongoing dynamics between investors with different trading styles. Because the market risk indicators may have small false signals, it is better to identify suitable times to hedge a portfolio using different long/short signals. Restaurant Brands' indicators that are reflective of the short sentiment are summarized in the table below.
| Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 302 M | |
| Cash And Short Term Investments | 1.1 B |
Restaurant Brands Fundamentals Growth
Restaurant Pink Sheet prices reflect investors' perceptions of the future prospects and financial health of Restaurant Brands, and Restaurant Brands fundamentals are critical determinants of its market performance. Overall, investors pay close attention to revenue and earnings growth, profit margins, and debt levels. These fundamentals can have a significant impact on Restaurant Pink Sheet performance.
| Return On Equity | 0.35 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0552 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.22 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.32 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 36.56 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 143.3 M | |||
| Price To Earning | 30.72 X | |||
| Price To Book | 5.54 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 3.68 X | |||
| Revenue | 5.74 B | |||
| EBITDA | 2.04 B | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 838 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 2.43 X | |||
| Total Debt | 12.92 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 3.71 % | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 11.69 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 1.73 B | |||
| Earnings Per Share | 3.11 X | |||
| Total Asset | 23.25 B | |||
| Retained Earnings | 225.5 M | |||
| Current Asset | 1.83 B | |||
| Current Liabilities | 1.19 B | |||
About Restaurant Brands Performance
By analyzing Restaurant Brands' fundamental ratios, stakeholders can gain valuable insights into Restaurant Brands' financial health, operational efficiency, and overall profitability, helping them make informed investment and management decisions. For instance, if Restaurant Brands has a high ROA and ROE, it suggests that the company is efficiently using its assets and equity to generate substantial profits, making it an attractive investment. Conversely, if Restaurant Brands has a low ROA and ROE, it may indicate underlying issues in asset and equity management, signaling a need for operational improvements.
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership operates and franchises quick service restaurants in the United States and internationally. Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership is a subsidiary of Restaurant Brands International Inc. Restaurant Brands operates under Restaurants classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. It employs 5700 people.Things to note about Restaurant Brands performance evaluation
Checking the ongoing alerts about Restaurant Brands for important developments is a great way to find new opportunities for your next move. Pink Sheet alerts and notifications screener for Restaurant Brands help investors to be notified of important events, changes in technical or fundamental conditions, and significant headlines that can affect investment decisions.| Restaurant Brands generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| Restaurant Brands International has accumulated 12.92 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 3.71, implying the company greatly relies on financing operations through barrowing. Restaurant Brands has a current ratio of 0.87, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Restaurant Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Restaurant Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Restaurant Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Restaurant to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Restaurant Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity. | |
| Over 93.0% of Restaurant Brands shares are owned by institutional investors |
- Analyzing Restaurant Brands' financial statements, including its income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement, helps in understanding its overall financial health and growth potential.
- Getting a closer look at valuation ratios like price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, and price-to-book (P/B) ratio help in understanding whether Restaurant Brands' stock is overvalued or undervalued compared to its peers.
- Examining Restaurant Brands' industry or sector and how it is performing can give you an idea of its growth potential and how it is positioned relative to its competitors.
- Evaluating Restaurant Brands' management team can have a significant impact on its success or failure. Reviewing the track record and experience of Restaurant Brands' management team can help you assess the Company's leadership.
- Pay attention to analyst opinions and ratings of Restaurant Brands' pink sheet. These opinions can provide insight into Restaurant Brands' potential for growth and whether the stock is currently undervalued or overvalued.
Complementary Tools for Restaurant Pink Sheet analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine |