Gaming And Leisure Stock EBITDA
| 2GL Stock | EUR 48.79 0.11 0.22% |
Gaming and Leisure fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Gaming's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Gaming Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Gaming's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Gaming stock.
Gaming |
Gaming and Leisure Company EBITDA Analysis
Gaming's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Gaming EBITDA | 1.28 B |
Most of Gaming's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Gaming and Leisure is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Gaming and Leisure reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 1.28 B. This is 72.97% higher than that of the Real Estate sector and significantly higher than that of the REIT - Diversified industry. The ebitda for all Germany stocks is 67.06% higher than that of the company.
Gaming EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Gaming's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Gaming could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Gaming by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Gaming is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Gaming Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.19 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0558 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.52 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.74 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 18.82 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 262.35 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 4.46 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 92.76 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 21.76 X | |||
| Price To Book | 3.73 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 10.03 X | |||
| Revenue | 1.31 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 1.26 B | |||
| EBITDA | 1.28 B | |||
| Net Income | 684.65 M | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 30.33 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 0.14 X | |||
| Total Debt | 6.13 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 271.60 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.30 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 14.49 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 920.13 M | |||
| Earnings Per Share | 2.55 X | |||
| Target Price | 53.26 | |||
| Number Of Employees | 17 | |||
| Beta | 1.02 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 13.24 B | |||
| Total Asset | 10.93 B | |||
| Z Score | 1.2 | |||
| Annual Yield | 0.05 % | |||
| Five Year Return | 5.53 % | |||
| Net Asset | 10.93 B | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | 2.81 |
About Gaming Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Gaming and Leisure's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Gaming using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Gaming and Leisure based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Other Information on Investing in Gaming Stock
Gaming financial ratios help investors to determine whether Gaming Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Gaming with respect to the benefits of owning Gaming security.