Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Z Score

BIP Stock  USD 36.95  -0.02  -0.05%   

The Altman Z-Score provides a single-number summary of financial condition from five weighted ratios. Brookfield Infrastructure's Z-Score stands at 0.55 based on the latest filings, placing it in the higher distress probability range.

Brookfield Infrastructure Altman Z-Score
    
  0.55  

Interpreting Brookfield Infrastructure Z-Score

Above 3.0: typically indicates stronger condition
2.7 to 3.0: transition interval
1.8 to 2.7: watch interval
Below 1.8: higher distress probability interval

Why Monitor Z-Score for Brookfield Infrastructure

The model’s value lies in its simplicity and empirical track record. It collapses five distinct dimensions of financial health into a single number that can be compared across companies, sectors, and time periods with a consistent interpretation framework.

  

Brookfield Infrastructure's Z-Score is a linear multi-factor model designed to assess financial distress risk using a weighted combination of accounting ratios. Its interpretation depends on industry context and may be less directly comparable for asset-light business models. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to the algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University.

Z Score

 = 

Sum Of

5 Factors

ComponentValueWeightWeighted
Working Capital / Total Assets-3.28 billion / 128.15 billion1.2-0.03
Retained Earnings / Total Assets-4.23 billion / 128.15 billion1.4-0.05
EBITDA / Total Assets11.01 billion / 128.15 billion3.30.28
Market Cap / Total Debt17.15 billion / 64.5 billion0.60.16
Revenue / Total Assets
23.1 billion / 128.15 billion0.9990.18
Z-Score
0.55
Note: Altman's original specification uses EBIT for the third factor. Using EBITDA instead of EBIT may overstate T3, potentially inflating the overall Z-Score relative to the original specification.

Z Score Driver Correlations

The correlation data quantifies how Z Score at Brookfield Infrastructure relates to other financial line items. These relationships describe association across reporting periods, not causation.
Competition

Brookfield Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

$2.99 billion
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income stood at $2.85 billion as of December 31, 2025.

Fundamental Drivers Relationships

Institutional Holders

The level of institutional ownership in Brookfield Infrastructure reflects how much of Brookfield Infrastructure's stock is professionally managed. These investors often accumulate large blocks of Brookfield Infrastructure's stock and wield significant influence over management. Institutional investors in Brookfield Infrastructure's typically have longer holding periods than retail participants. Institutional ownership trends for Brookfield Infrastructure are most meaningful when viewed over multiple quarters.
Shares
National Bank Of Canada /fi/2025-12-31
5.3 M
Ccla Investment Management Ltd2025-12-31
4.7 M
Brookfield Corp2025-12-31
4.7 M
Connor Clark & Lunn Inv Mgmt Ltd2025-12-31
3.9 M
The Toronto-dominion Bank2025-12-31
3.9 M
Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts2025-12-31
3.3 M
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc2025-12-31
3.2 M
Mackenzie Investments2025-12-31
3.1 M
Ci Investments Inc2025-12-31
2.9 M
Royal Bank Of Canada2025-12-31
44.6 M
Principal Financial Group Inc2025-12-31
31.4 M

Important Fundamentals

Altman Z-Score Methodology & Financial Data

The Altman Z-Score for Brookfield Infrastructure is calculated from five financial ratios that measure liquidity, profitability, leverage, solvency, and asset productivity. Sales to Total Assets (X5) measures how efficiently the asset base generates revenue. Key Z-Score inputs for Brookfield Infrastructure include current ratio of 0.77, debt-to-equity of 1.3, working capital of -3.28 billion, retained earnings of -4.23 billion.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners values are built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with reporting definitions aligned before display. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Vlad Skutelnik, Macroaxis Contributor