This module uses fundamental data of Gaming Technologies to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Gaming Technologies M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Gaming Technologies Piotroski F Score and Gaming Technologies Altman Z Score analysis.
Gaming
Beneish M Score
Ptb Ratio
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Capex To Depreciation
Pb Ratio
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Net Income Per Share
Payables Turnover
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Interest Coverage
Capex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf Ratio
Days Payables Outstanding
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Intangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To Equity
Capex Per Share
Graham Net Net
Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings Ratio
Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables Outstanding
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Ebt Per Ebit
Effective Tax Rate
Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed
Debt Equity Ratio
Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per E B T
Cash Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book Ratio
Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Return On Assets
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Cash
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Change To Netincome
Change To Liabilities
Investments
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Non Cash Items
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Net Tangible Assets
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Current Assets
Common Stock
Property Plant Equipment
Total Assets
Short Long Term Debt Total
Total Stockholder Equity
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Net Debt
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Cash And Short Term Investments
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Short Term Investments
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Current Assets
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Short Long Term Debt
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Capital Stock
Net Working Capital
Short Term Debt
Intangible Assets
Long Term Debt
Interest Expense
Ebit
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Net Interest Income
Depreciation And Amortization
Selling General Administrative
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Research Development
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Reconciled Depreciation
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Gaming Technologies' Short and Long Term Debt Total is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Net Debt is likely to gain to about 2.5 M in 2024, whereas Interest Debt Per Share is likely to drop 0.14 in 2024. At this time, Gaming Technologies' Capex To Depreciation is comparatively stable compared to the past year. ROIC is likely to gain to 1.49 in 2024, whereas Free Cash Flow Yield is likely to drop (0.02) in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Gaming Technologies is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Gaming Technologies' top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Gaming Technologies executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Gaming Technologies' earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Gaming Technologies' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Gaming Technologies' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Gaming Technologies in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Gaming Technologies' degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Gaming Technologies Common's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Gaming Technologies using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Gaming Technologies Common based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running Gaming Technologies' price analysis, check to measure Gaming Technologies' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Gaming Technologies is operating at the current time. Most of Gaming Technologies' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Gaming Technologies' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Gaming Technologies' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Gaming Technologies to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.