Highest Performances Holdings Stock Net Income
| MAAS Stock | 6.27 0.66 11.76% |
As of the 23rd of January, Highest Performances retains the Downside Deviation of 4.56, market risk adjusted performance of (15.57), and Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.1807. Concerning fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model lets you check existing technical drivers of Highest Performances Holdings, as well as the relationship between them. Please check out Highest Performances information ratio, as well as the relationship between the potential upside and kurtosis to decide if Highest Performances is priced fairly, providing market reflects its last-minute price of 6.27 per share. Given that Highest Performances Holdings has jensen alpha of 1.11, we strongly advise you to confirm Highest Performances's regular market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Highest Performances Total Revenue |
|
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -460.9 M | -437.8 M | |
| Net Loss | -460.9 M | -437.8 M | |
| Net Loss | (5.52) | (5.25) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.52 | 0.71 |
Highest | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Highest Stock |
Latest Highest Performances' Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Highest Performances Holdings over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Highest Performances financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Highest Performances Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Highest Performances' Net Loss historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Highest Performances' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Net Income | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Highest Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | (52,259,403) | |
| Geometric Mean | 65,906,713 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | (251.57) | |
| Mean Deviation | 104,362,451 | |
| Median | 37,813,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 131,471,067 | |
| Sample Variance | 17284.6T | |
| Range | 354.3M | |
| R-Value | (0.83) | |
| Mean Square Error | 5602.6T | |
| R-Squared | 0.70 | |
| Significance | 0.000031 | |
| Slope | (21,722,149) | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 276554.3T |
Highest Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Highest Performances
Highest Performances Net Income component correlations
Highest Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Highest Performances is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Highest Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Highest Performances' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Highest Performances' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Highest Performances' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Is Asset Management & Custody Banks space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Highest Performances. If investors know Highest will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Highest Performances listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (3.06) |
The market value of Highest Performances is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Highest that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Highest Performances' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Highest Performances' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Highest Performances' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Highest Performances' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Highest Performances' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Highest Performances is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Highest Performances' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Highest Performances 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Highest Performances' stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Highest Performances.
| 10/25/2025 |
| 01/23/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Highest Performances on October 25, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Highest Performances Holdings or generate 0.0% return on investment in Highest Performances over 90 days. Highest Performances is related to or competes with Starry Sea, Hennessy, Grande Group, Sol Strategies, Great Elm, Bluemount Holdings, and Royalty Management. Highest Performances is entity of United States More
Highest Performances Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Highest Performances' stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Highest Performances Holdings upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 4.56 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.2114 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 24.13 | |||
| Value At Risk | (6.17) | |||
| Potential Upside | 8.92 |
Highest Performances Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Highest Performances' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Highest Performances' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Highest Performances historical prices to predict the future Highest Performances' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1807 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 1.11 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.4934 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.2204 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (15.58) |
Highest Performances January 23, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1807 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (15.57) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 3.59 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 3.34 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 4.56 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 428.73 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 4.75 | |||
| Variance | 22.59 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.2114 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 1.11 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.4934 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.2204 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (15.58) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 24.13 | |||
| Value At Risk | (6.17) | |||
| Potential Upside | 8.92 | |||
| Downside Variance | 20.77 | |||
| Semi Variance | 11.15 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (3.86) | |||
| Skewness | 0.3979 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.4017 |
Highest Performances Backtested Returns
Highest Performances appears to be relatively risky, given 3 months investment horizon. Highest Performances holds Efficiency (Sharpe) Ratio of 0.2, which attests that the entity had a 0.2 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. By evaluating Highest Performances' technical indicators, you can evaluate if the expected return of 0.93% is justified by implied risk. Please utilize Highest Performances' Market Risk Adjusted Performance of (15.57), downside deviation of 4.56, and Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.1807 to validate if our risk estimates are consistent with your expectations. On a scale of 0 to 100, Highest Performances holds a performance score of 15. The company retains a Market Volatility (i.e., Beta) of -0.0705, which attests to not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, returns on owning Highest Performances are expected to decrease at a much lower rate. During the bear market, Highest Performances is likely to outperform the market. Please check Highest Performances' potential upside, and the relationship between the total risk alpha and kurtosis , to make a quick decision on whether Highest Performances' current trending patterns will revert.
Auto-correlation | 0.63 |
Good predictability
Highest Performances Holdings has good predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Highest Performances time series from 25th of October 2025 to 9th of December 2025 and 9th of December 2025 to 23rd of January 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Highest Performances price movement. The serial correlation of 0.63 indicates that roughly 63.0% of current Highest Performances price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.63 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.74 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.37 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Highest Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Highest Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Highest Performances' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Highest Performances could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Highest Performances by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Highest Performances is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Highest Performances Current Valuation Drivers
We derive many important indicators used in calculating different scores of Highest Performances from analyzing Highest Performances' financial statements. These drivers represent accounts that assess Highest Performances' ability to generate profits relative to its revenue, operating costs, and shareholders' equity. Below are some of Highest Performances' important valuation drivers and their relationship over time.
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 (projected) | ||
| Market Cap | 3.2B | 3.3B | 3.6B | 3.6B | 3.2B | 2.6B | |
| Enterprise Value | 3.0B | 3.1B | 3.4B | 3.5B | 3.2B | 2.5B |
Highest Fundamentals
| Current Valuation | 661.51 M | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 313.15 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 91.86 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 0.01 % | |||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 7.58 K | |||
| Price To Book | 3.88 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.08 X | |||
| Total Debt | 215.56 M | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 334.96 X | |||
| Short Ratio | 0.69 X | |||
| Earnings Per Share | (3.06) X | |||
| Number Of Employees | 230 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 1.19 B | |||
| Total Asset | 4.28 B | |||
| Retained Earnings | (321.25 M) | |||
| Working Capital | 1.53 B | |||
| Net Asset | 4.28 B |
About Highest Performances Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Highest Performances Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Highest Performances using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Highest Performances Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Thematic Opportunities
Explore Investment Opportunities
Additional Tools for Highest Stock Analysis
When running Highest Performances' price analysis, check to measure Highest Performances' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Highest Performances is operating at the current time. Most of Highest Performances' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Highest Performances' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Highest Performances' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Highest Performances to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.