Nexgel Warrant Stock Beneish M Score

NXGLW Stock  USD 0.48  0.03  5.88%   
This module uses fundamental data of NexGel Warrant to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. NexGel Warrant M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out NexGel Warrant Piotroski F Score and NexGel Warrant Altman Z Score analysis.
For more information on how to buy NexGel Stock please use our How to Invest in NexGel Warrant guide.
  
At this time, NexGel Warrant's Net Debt is fairly stable compared to the past year. Short Term Debt is likely to climb to about 851.6 K in 2024, whereas Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 358.3 K in 2024. At this time, NexGel Warrant's Days Sales Outstanding is fairly stable compared to the past year. Stock Based Compensation To Revenue is likely to climb to 0.08 in 2024, whereas PTB Ratio is likely to drop 2.44 in 2024.
At this time, it appears that NexGel Warrant is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if NexGel Warrant's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by NexGel Warrant executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of NexGel Warrant's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.72
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
Elasticity of Receivables

2.02

Focus
Asset Quality

N/A

Focus
Expense Coverage

1.65

Focus
Gross Margin Strengs

1.06

Focus
Accruals Factor

1.65

Focus
Depreciation Resistance

N/A

Focus
Net Sales Growth

0.52

Focus
Financial Leverage Condition

0.86

Focus

NexGel Warrant Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends

The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if NexGel Warrant's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Net Receivables664.6 K633 K
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Revenue2.1 M4.1 M
Way Down
Very volatile
Total Assets6.1 M10 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets3.9 M5.1 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Assets Total5.1 M4.9 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Depreciation And Amortization266.2 K443 K
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Selling General Administrative2.6 MM
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Liabilities1.3 M2.5 M
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total2.4 M2.2 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Short Term Debt851.6 K558 K
Way Up
Slightly volatile
Long Term Debt358.3 K513 K
Way Down
Slightly volatile

NexGel Warrant Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between NexGel Warrant's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards NexGel Warrant in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find NexGel Warrant's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.

About NexGel Warrant Beneish M Score

M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.

Depreciation And Amortization

266,200

At this time, NexGel Warrant's Depreciation And Amortization is fairly stable compared to the past year.

NexGel Warrant Earnings Manipulation Drivers

Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as NexGel Warrant. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
201920202021202220232024 (projected)
Net Receivables102K73K209K222K633K664.7K
Total Revenue717K674K1.6M2.0M4.1M2.1M
Total Assets1.9M2.3M17.0M10.4M10.0M6.1M
Total Current Assets513K363K13.9M7.5M5.1M3.9M
Operating Income(1.9M)(2.3M)(2.6M)(3.3M)(3.5M)(3.7M)
Investments(1K)(312K)(269K)(5.6M)5.2M5.5M
Gross Profit Margin(0.19)(0.43)0.0058030.130.150.16

About NexGel Warrant Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze NexGel Warrant's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of NexGel Warrant using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of NexGel Warrant based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Additional Tools for NexGel Stock Analysis

When running NexGel Warrant's price analysis, check to measure NexGel Warrant's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy NexGel Warrant is operating at the current time. Most of NexGel Warrant's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of NexGel Warrant's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move NexGel Warrant's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of NexGel Warrant to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.