This module uses fundamental data of Solid Impact to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Solid Impact M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Solid Impact Investments. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
Solid
Beneish M Score
Change In Cash
End Period Cash Flow
Change To Liabilities
Total Assets
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Tangible Assets
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Total Liab
Net Invested Capital
Total Current Assets
Net Working Capital
Ebit
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Solid Impact's M Score is inapplicable. The earnings manipulation may begin if Solid Impact's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Solid Impact executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Solid Impact's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Solid Impact's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Solid Impact's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Solid Impact in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Solid Impact's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Total Assets
215,303
At present, Solid Impact's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
About Solid Impact Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Solid Impact Investments's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Solid Impact using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Solid Impact Investments based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Solid Impact financial ratios help investors to determine whether Solid Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Solid with respect to the benefits of owning Solid Impact security.