Music Licensing Stock Net Income
| SONG Stock | USD 4.93 0.00 0.00% |
As of the 15th of February 2026, Music Licensing secures the Downside Deviation of 61.59, risk adjusted performance of 0.106, and Mean Deviation of 16.08. In connection with fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model lets you check existing technical drivers of Music Licensing, as well as the relationship between them. Please verify Music Licensing jensen alpha and downside variance to decide if Music Licensing is priced some-what accurately, providing market reflects its recent price of 4.93 per share. Given that Music Licensing has jensen alpha of 3.85, we recommend you to check Music Licensing's last-minute market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Music Licensing's financial statements offer valuable quarterly and annual insights to potential investors, highlighting the company's current and historical financial position, overall management performance, and changes in financial standing over time. Key fundamentals influencing Music Licensing's valuation are provided below:Music Licensing does not presently have any fundamental ratios for analysis. This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools. Music |
Music Licensing 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Music Licensing's pink sheet what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Music Licensing.
| 11/17/2025 |
| 02/15/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Music Licensing on November 17, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Music Licensing or generate 0.0% return on investment in Music Licensing over 90 days. Music Licensing is related to or competes with Lingerie Fighting, and Spanish Broadcasting. Akazoo S.A. operates as an on-demand music and audio streaming, and media and AI technology company More
Music Licensing Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Music Licensing's pink sheet current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Music Licensing upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 61.59 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1171 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 198.65 | |||
| Value At Risk | (50.00) | |||
| Potential Upside | 100.0 |
Music Licensing Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Music Licensing's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Music Licensing's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Music Licensing historical prices to predict the future Music Licensing's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.106 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 3.85 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 1.48 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0632 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 2.49 |
Music Licensing February 15, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.106 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 2.5 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 16.08 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 18.14 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 61.59 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 838.59 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 33.21 | |||
| Variance | 1102.67 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1171 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 3.85 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 1.48 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0632 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 2.49 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 198.65 | |||
| Value At Risk | (50.00) | |||
| Potential Upside | 100.0 | |||
| Downside Variance | 3793.59 | |||
| Semi Variance | 329.05 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (56.83) | |||
| Skewness | 1.57 | |||
| Kurtosis | 7.04 |
Music Licensing Backtested Returns
Music Licensing is abnormally volatile given 3 months investment horizon. Music Licensing has Sharpe Ratio of 0.12, which conveys that the firm had a 0.12 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We were able to interpolate twenty-four different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate if expected returns of 4.22% are justified by taking the suggested risk. Use Music Licensing Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.106, downside deviation of 61.59, and Mean Deviation of 16.08 to evaluate company specific risk that cannot be diversified away. Music Licensing holds a performance score of 9 on a scale of zero to a hundred. The company secures a Beta (Market Risk) of 1.59, which conveys a somewhat significant risk relative to the market. As the market goes up, the company is expected to outperform it. However, if the market returns are negative, Music Licensing will likely underperform. Use Music Licensing sortino ratio, downside variance, as well as the relationship between the Downside Variance and rate of daily change , to analyze future returns on Music Licensing.
Auto-correlation | -0.05 |
Very weak reverse predictability
Music Licensing has very weak reverse predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Music Licensing time series from 17th of November 2025 to 1st of January 2026 and 1st of January 2026 to 15th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Music Licensing price movement. The serial correlation of -0.05 indicates that only as little as 5.0% of current Music Licensing price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.05 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.06 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 2.05 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Based on the recorded statements, Music Licensing reported net income of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Communication Services sector and about the same as Internet Content & Information (which currently averages 0.0) industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
Music Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Music Licensing's direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the pink sheets which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Music Licensing could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Music Licensing by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Music Licensing is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Music Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -21.38 | |||
| Return On Asset | -5.0E-4 | |||
| Operating Margin | (9.35) % | |||
| Revenue | 20.1 K | |||
| Gross Profit | 20.1 K | |||
| Debt To Equity | 9.70 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 3.16 X | |||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 0.09 X | |||
| Market Capitalization | 57.69 M |
About Music Licensing Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Music Licensing's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Music Licensing using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Music Licensing based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
| FSLY | Fastly Class A | |
| MOB | Mobilicom Limited American | |
| CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill | |
| CSAN | Cosan SA ADR | |
| RKT | Rocket Companies |
Other Information on Investing in Music Pink Sheet
Music Licensing financial ratios help investors to determine whether Music Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Music with respect to the benefits of owning Music Licensing security.