This module uses fundamental data of Interactive Strength to approximate its Piotroski F score. Interactive Strength F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Interactive Strength Common. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Interactive Strength financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Interactive Strength Altman Z Score, Interactive Strength Correlation, Interactive Strength Valuation, as well as analyze Interactive Strength Alpha and Beta and Interactive Strength Hype Analysis.
At this time, it appears that Interactive Strength's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Interactive Strength is to make sure Interactive is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Interactive Strength's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Interactive Strength's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Interactive Strength's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Interactive Strength in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
(17.06)
At this time, Interactive Strength's Book Value Per Share is relatively stable compared to the past year.
Interactive Strength ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Interactive Strength's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Interactive Strength's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Interactive Strength Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Interactive Strength Common's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Interactive Strength using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Interactive Strength Common based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Interactive Strength position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Strength will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Interactive Strength could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Interactive Strength when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Interactive Strength - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Interactive Strength Common to buy it.
The correlation of Interactive Strength is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Interactive Strength moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Interactive Strength moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Interactive Strength can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
When running Interactive Strength's price analysis, check to measure Interactive Strength's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Interactive Strength is operating at the current time. Most of Interactive Strength's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Interactive Strength's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Interactive Strength's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Interactive Strength to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.