Crescent Revenue Per Share vs Cost Of Revenue Analysis
CCAP Stock | USD 19.22 0.02 0.10% |
Crescent Capital financial indicator trend analysis is way more than just evaluating Crescent Capital BDC prevailing accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Crescent Capital BDC is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Crescent Capital Revenue Per Share and its Cost Of Revenue accounts. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Crescent Capital BDC. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation.
Revenue Per Share vs Cost Of Revenue
Revenue Per Share vs Cost Of Revenue Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Crescent Capital BDC Revenue Per Share account and Cost Of Revenue. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have almost identical trend.
The correlation between Crescent Capital's Revenue Per Share and Cost Of Revenue is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Revenue Per Share that can explain the historical movement of Cost Of Revenue in the same time period over historical financial statements of Crescent Capital BDC, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Crescent Capital's Revenue Per Share and Cost Of Revenue is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Revenue Per Share of Crescent Capital BDC are associated (or correlated) with its Cost Of Revenue. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Cost Of Revenue has no effect on the direction of Revenue Per Share i.e., Crescent Capital's Revenue Per Share and Cost Of Revenue go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.92 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Very Strong |
Revenue Per Share
The amount of revenue generated by a company per share of stock, calculated by dividing total revenue by the average number of shares outstanding.Cost Of Revenue
Cost of Revenue is found on Crescent Capital BDC income statement and represents the costs associated with goods and services Crescent Capital provides. Indirect cost, such as salaries, is not included. In other words, cost of revenue is the total cost incurred to obtain a sale. It is more than the traditional cost of goods sold, since it includes specific selling and marketing activities.Most indicators from Crescent Capital's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Crescent Capital BDC current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Crescent Capital BDC. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. At this time, Crescent Capital's Selling General Administrative is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/30/2024, Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is likely to grow to 21.69, while Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is likely to drop 0.21.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Net Interest Income | 69.5M | 79.6M | 115.0M | 62.2M | Income Tax Expense | 3.6M | 961K | 274K | 260.3K |
Crescent Capital fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Crescent Capital Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Crescent Capital fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 747.2M | 1.1B | 1.3B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 886.5M | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 644.0M | 471.9M | 631.0M | 654.5M | 844.8M | 462.1M | |
Other Current Liab | (12.1M) | (15.5M) | (18.2M) | (21.6M) | 9.8M | 10.3M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 12.1M | 15.5M | 18.2M | 21.6M | 35.9M | 37.7M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 406.9M | 560M | 652.3M | 612.5M | 742.6M | 441.5M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 406.9M | 560M | 652.3M | 612.5M | 704.4M | 394.6M | |
Net Debt | 317.4M | 470.0M | 621.0M | 648.1M | 837.0M | 878.9M | |
Retained Earnings | (7.4M) | (34.7M) | (13.9M) | (62.5M) | (223.3M) | (212.2M) | |
Accounts Payable | 12.1M | 15.5M | 18.2M | 21.6M | 26.1M | 14.0M | |
Cash | 4.6M | 1.9M | 10.1M | 6.4M | 7.8M | 7.4M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 727.3M | 1.0B | 1.3B | 1.3B | 114K | 108.3K | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | (420.5B) | (630K) | (42M) | (91K) | (1.6B) | (1.7B) | |
Other Assets | 12.3M | 14.1M | 13.6M | 15.4M | 1.6B | 1.7B | |
Long Term Debt | 150.8M | 235.7M | 322.0M | 654.5M | 752.6M | 790.3M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 4.6M | 1.9M | 10.1M | 6.4M | 24.5M | 25.7M | |
Net Receivables | 3.0M | 3.9M | 21.6M | 10.0M | 14.3M | 15.0M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 13.4K | 20.9K | 28K | 31K | 35.7K | 37.4K | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 17.3M | 27.7M | 28.5M | 30.9M | 35.9M | 31.2M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 150.8M | 235.7M | 322.0M | 654.5M | 752.6M | 790.3M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 747.2M | 1.1B | 1.3B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 886.5M | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 322.0M | 471.9M | 631.0M | 21.6M | 578K | 549.1K | |
Capital Surpluse | 170.8M | 266.0M | 414.3M | 675.0M | 776.3M | 815.1M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 414.3M | 594.7M | 666.2M | 675.0M | 965.9M | 483.9M | |
Total Liab | 340.3M | 494.2M | 665.5M | 690.3M | 884.8M | 445.0M | |
Long Term Investments | 728.0M | 1.0B | 1.3B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 863.2M | |
Total Current Assets | 7.6M | 5.8M | 31.7M | 16.3M | 38.7M | 36.8M | |
Common Stock | 13.4K | 20.9K | 28K | 31K | 37K | 22.0K | |
Other Liab | 944K | 2.2M | 1.6M | 1.1M | 1.2M | 1.2M | |
Net Invested Capital | 728.9M | 1.0B | 1.3B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 1.1B | |
Other Current Assets | (16.4M) | (18.7M) | (45.2M) | (27.0M) | (38.7M) | (36.8M) |
Pair Trading with Crescent Capital
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Crescent Capital position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crescent Capital will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Crescent Stock
Moving against Crescent Stock
0.64 | BRACU | Broad Capital Acquisition | PairCorr |
0.42 | EMCGU | Embrace Change Acqui | PairCorr |
0.4 | PFTAU | Portage Fintech Acqu | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Crescent Capital could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Crescent Capital when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Crescent Capital - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Crescent Capital BDC to buy it.
The correlation of Crescent Capital is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Crescent Capital moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Crescent Capital BDC moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Crescent Capital can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Crescent Stock Analysis
When running Crescent Capital's price analysis, check to measure Crescent Capital's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Crescent Capital is operating at the current time. Most of Crescent Capital's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Crescent Capital's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Crescent Capital's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Crescent Capital to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.