Designer Short Long Term Debt vs Net Receivables Analysis
DBI Stock | USD 4.89 0.23 4.94% |
Designer Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining Designer Brands latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Designer Brands is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Designer Brands Short Long Term Debt and its Net Receivables accounts. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.
Short Long Term Debt vs Net Receivables
Short Long Term Debt vs Net Receivables Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Designer Brands Short Long Term Debt account and Net Receivables. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have significant contrarian relationship.
The correlation between Designer Brands' Short Long Term Debt and Net Receivables is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Short Long Term Debt that can explain the historical movement of Net Receivables in the same time period over historical financial statements of Designer Brands, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Designer Brands' Short Long Term Debt and Net Receivables is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Short Long Term Debt of Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with its Net Receivables. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Net Receivables has no effect on the direction of Short Long Term Debt i.e., Designer Brands' Short Long Term Debt and Net Receivables go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | -0.41 |
Relationship Direction | Negative |
Relationship Strength | Very Weak |
Short Long Term Debt
The total of a company's short-term and long-term borrowings.Net Receivables
Most indicators from Designer Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Designer Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.As of now, Designer Brands' Discontinued Operations is increasing as compared to previous years. The Designer Brands' current Tax Provision is estimated to increase to about 16.3 M, while Selling General Administrative is projected to decrease to under 575.3 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 1.1B | 1.1B | 974.9M | 673.3M | Total Revenue | 3.2B | 3.3B | 3.1B | 2.2B |
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Designer Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Designer Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.1B | 1.2B | |
Other Current Liab | 142.7M | 130.3M | (67.3M) | (70.9M) | (77.7M) | (73.8M) | |
Total Current Liabilities | 680.0M | 752.7M | 758.9M | 636.1M | 622.3M | 363.4M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 720.9M | 243.0M | 412.4M | 429.7M | 359.2M | 581.9M | |
Other Liab | 27.5M | 30.8M | 24.4M | 25.0M | 28.7M | 27.3M | |
Retained Earnings | 267.1M | (228.8M) | (74.3M) | 82.0M | 98.9M | 144.4M | |
Accounts Payable | 299.1M | 245.1M | 340.9M | 255.4M | 289.4M | 188.5M | |
Cash | 86.6M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 74.0M | |
Other Assets | 56.2M | 31.2M | 31.7M | 91.1M | 82.0M | 53.0M | |
Long Term Debt | 190M | 272.3M | 225.5M | 281.0M | 420.3M | 441.4M | |
Inventory | 632.6M | 473.2M | 586.4M | 605.7M | 571.3M | 431.7M | |
Other Current Assets | 67.5M | 51.8M | 55.3M | 47.8M | 73.3M | 59.0M | |
Total Liab | 1.7B | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.6B | 1.7B | 1.8B | |
Intangible Assets | 22.8M | 15.6M | 15.5M | 31.9M | 82.8M | 87.0M | |
Common Stock | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.0B | 1.0B | 1.0B | 650.3M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.1B | 1.1B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 1.2B | 1.3B | 1.0B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Net Debt | 1.1B | 1.2B | 948.5M | 1.0B | 1.2B | 1.3B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 74.6M | 72.2M | 77.3M | 72.1M | 63.4M | 79.8M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 2.5B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.0B | 2.1B | 1.3B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 1.1B | 980.9M | 843.3M | 940.6M | 1.1B | 1.1B | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (350.9M) | (398.4M) | (515.1M) | (662.6M) | (764.8M) | (726.6M) | |
Good Will | 89.5M | 113.6M | 93.7M | 97.1M | 123.8M | 129.9M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 941.3M | 988.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 1.6B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 111.5M | 59.6M | 72.7M | 58.8M | 49.2M | 46.7M | |
Net Receivables | 89.2M | 196.0M | 199.8M | 77.8M | 83.6M | 46.3M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 961.2M | 978.8M | 971.4M | 990.2M | 1.1B | 673.7M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 1.3B | 997.0M | 904.0M | 935.8M | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Total Current Assets | 900.8M | 780.6M | 914.2M | 789.9M | 777.4M | 723.3M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (2.5M) | (3.3M) | (3.6M) | (5.4M) | (5.6M) | (5.9M) | |
Short Term Debt | 186.7M | 307.3M | 404.5M | 380.2M | 339.8M | 356.8M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 51.6M | 45.8M | 52.5M | 52.0M | 47.6M | 46.9M | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 24.3M | 31.2M | 31.3M | 42.8M | 49.0M | 35.4M | |
Short Term Investments | 124.6M | 69.7M | 25.0M | 58.6M | 52.7M | 50.1M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 584.4M | 133.7M | 303.2M | 303.9M | 273.5M | 537.6M |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Designer Brands offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Designer Brands' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Designer Brands Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Designer Brands Stock:Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.
Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.57) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share (0.03) | Revenue Per Share 53.234 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.