Quanta Cash Conversion Cycle vs Ev To Free Cash Flow Analysis
PWR Stock | USD 343.94 2.66 0.77% |
Quanta Services financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Quanta Services prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Quanta Services is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Quanta Services Cash Conversion Cycle and its Ev To Free Cash Flow accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Quanta Services. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in housing. To learn how to invest in Quanta Stock, please use our How to Invest in Quanta Services guide.
Cash Conversion Cycle vs Ev To Free Cash Flow
Cash Conversion Cycle vs Ev To Free Cash Flow Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Quanta Services Cash Conversion Cycle account and Ev To Free Cash Flow. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have fragmental relationship.
The correlation between Quanta Services' Cash Conversion Cycle and Ev To Free Cash Flow is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Cash Conversion Cycle that can explain the historical movement of Ev To Free Cash Flow in the same time period over historical financial statements of Quanta Services, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Quanta Services' Cash Conversion Cycle and Ev To Free Cash Flow is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Cash Conversion Cycle of Quanta Services are associated (or correlated) with its Ev To Free Cash Flow. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Ev To Free Cash Flow has no effect on the direction of Cash Conversion Cycle i.e., Quanta Services' Cash Conversion Cycle and Ev To Free Cash Flow go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.41 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Weak |
Cash Conversion Cycle
Ev To Free Cash Flow
A valuation metric comparing the company's enterprise value to its free cash flow, used to evaluate whether a company is undervalued or overvalued.Most indicators from Quanta Services' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Quanta Services current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Quanta Services. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in housing. To learn how to invest in Quanta Stock, please use our How to Invest in Quanta Services guide.At this time, Quanta Services' Selling General Administrative is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/29/2024, Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is likely to grow to 0.10, though Discontinued Operations is likely to grow to (373.6 K).
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 2.0B | 2.5B | 2.9B | 3.1B | Total Revenue | 13.0B | 17.1B | 20.9B | 21.9B |
Quanta Services fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Quanta Services Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Quanta Services fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 8.3B | 8.4B | 12.9B | 13.5B | 16.2B | 17.0B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 1.7B | 1.5B | 4.0B | 4.0B | 4.5B | 4.7B | |
Other Current Liab | 750.1M | 1.1B | 1.7B | 777.0M | 955.7M | 1.0B | |
Total Current Liabilities | 2.3B | 2.1B | 3.2B | 3.4B | 5.2B | 5.5B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 4.1B | 4.3B | 5.1B | 5.4B | 6.3B | 6.6B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 1.7B | 1.8B | 2.2B | 2.3B | 2.6B | 2.7B | |
Net Debt | 1.5B | 1.3B | 3.8B | 3.5B | 3.2B | 3.3B | |
Retained Earnings | 2.9B | 3.3B | 3.7B | 4.2B | 4.9B | 5.1B | |
Accounts Payable | 1.5B | 798.0M | 1.3B | 1.3B | 2.0B | 2.1B | |
Cash | 164.8M | 184.6M | 229.1M | 428.5M | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Non Current Assets Total | 4.5B | 4.8B | 8.1B | 7.9B | 8.6B | 9.0B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 393.3M | 435.7M | 632.2M | (106.5M) | 565.6M | 593.9M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 164.8M | 184.6M | 229.1M | 428.5M | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Net Receivables | 3.3B | 3.2B | 4.2B | 4.8B | 5.8B | 6.1B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 147.5M | 145.2M | 145.4M | 148.0M | 148.8M | 159.0M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 8.3B | 8.4B | 12.9B | 13.5B | 16.2B | 17.0B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 2.0B | 1.9B | 4.6B | 4.7B | 4.7B | 5.0B | |
Inventory | 55.7M | 50.5M | 84.7M | 103.3M | 175.7M | 184.4M | |
Other Current Assets | 261.3M | 183.4M | 215.1M | 249.6M | 387.1M | 406.5M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 1.4B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 1.5B | 1.7B | 1.8B | |
Total Liab | 4.3B | 4.0B | 7.7B | 8.1B | 10.0B | 10.5B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 1.7B | 1.8B | 2.2B | 2.3B | 4.4B | 4.6B | |
Total Current Assets | 3.8B | 3.6B | 4.7B | 5.5B | 7.7B | 8.1B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (241.8M) | (233.0M) | (237.7M) | (310.7M) | (282.9M) | (268.8M) | |
Short Term Debt | 167.3M | 185.0M | 185.7M | 185.6M | 691.2M | 725.8M | |
Intangible Assets | 413.7M | 435.7M | 1.8B | 1.5B | 1.4B | 1.4B | |
Other Liab | 526.1M | 557.6M | 678.4M | 795.4M | 914.7M | 960.4M | |
Other Assets | 393.3M | 692.56 | 632.2M | 622.7M | 716.1M | 752.0M | |
Long Term Debt | 1.3B | 1.2B | 3.7B | 3.7B | 3.7B | 3.8B | |
Good Will | 2.0B | 2.1B | 3.5B | 3.6B | 4.0B | 4.2B | |
Property Plant Equipment | 1.7B | 1.8B | 2.2B | 2.3B | 2.6B | 2.7B | |
Treasury Stock | (586.8M) | (857.8M) | (980.3M) | (1.2B) | (1.1B) | (1.0B) | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 606.1M | 528.9M | 802.9M | 1.1B | 1.5B | 1.6B | |
Net Tangible Assets | 1.6B | 1.8B | (217.8M) | 338.1M | 304.3M | 289.1M | |
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity | 3.5M | 4.8M | 4.6M | 15.4M | 13.8M | 13.1M | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 2.9B | 3.3B | 3.7B | 4.2B | 4.8B | 5.0B |
Pair Trading with Quanta Services
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Quanta Services position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Quanta Services will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Quanta Stock
0.84 | J | Jacobs Solutions | PairCorr |
0.75 | ESOA | Energy Services Fiscal Year End 16th of December 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Quanta Services could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Quanta Services when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Quanta Services - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Quanta Services to buy it.
The correlation of Quanta Services is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Quanta Services moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Quanta Services moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Quanta Services can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Quanta Stock Analysis
When running Quanta Services' price analysis, check to measure Quanta Services' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Quanta Services is operating at the current time. Most of Quanta Services' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Quanta Services' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Quanta Services' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Quanta Services to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.