Rogers Non Recurring vs Selling General Administrative Analysis
RCI-A Stock | CAD 53.05 1.95 3.55% |
Rogers Communications financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Rogers Communications prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Rogers Communications is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Rogers Communications Non Recurring and its Selling General Administrative accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Rogers Communications. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. For more information on how to buy Rogers Stock please use our How to Invest in Rogers Communications guide.
Non Recurring vs Selling General Administrative
Non Recurring vs Selling General Administrative Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Rogers Communications Non Recurring account and Selling General Administrative. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have significant contrarian relationship.
The correlation between Rogers Communications' Non Recurring and Selling General Administrative is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Non Recurring that can explain the historical movement of Selling General Administrative in the same time period over historical financial statements of Rogers Communications, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Rogers Communications' Non Recurring and Selling General Administrative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Non Recurring of Rogers Communications are associated (or correlated) with its Selling General Administrative. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Selling General Administrative has no effect on the direction of Non Recurring i.e., Rogers Communications' Non Recurring and Selling General Administrative go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | -0.48 |
Relationship Direction | Negative |
Relationship Strength | Very Weak |
Non Recurring
Selling General Administrative
Most indicators from Rogers Communications' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Rogers Communications current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Rogers Communications. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. For more information on how to buy Rogers Stock please use our How to Invest in Rogers Communications guide.At this time, Rogers Communications' Selling General Administrative is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Tax Provision is likely to gain to about 646.8 M in 2024, whereas Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is likely to drop 2.58 in 2024.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Total Revenue | 14.7B | 15.4B | 19.3B | 10.5B | Depreciation And Amortization | 2.7B | 2.6B | 4.2B | 4.4B |
Rogers Communications fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Rogers Communications Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Rogers Communications fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 37.0B | 38.9B | 42.0B | 55.7B | 69.3B | 72.7B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 19.9B | 21.3B | 22.8B | 36.7B | 45.2B | 47.5B | |
Total Current Liabilities | 6.0B | 6.6B | 8.6B | 9.5B | 8.8B | 9.2B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 9.4B | 9.6B | 10.5B | 10.1B | 10.4B | 11.0B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 13.9B | 14.0B | 14.7B | 15.6B | 24.3B | 25.5B | |
Net Debt | 19.4B | 18.8B | 22.1B | 36.3B | 44.4B | 46.6B | |
Retained Earnings | 7.4B | 7.9B | 8.9B | 9.8B | 9.8B | 10.3B | |
Accounts Payable | 3.0B | 2.7B | 3.4B | 3.7B | 4.2B | 2.2B | |
Cash | 494M | 2.5B | 715M | 463M | 800M | 452.0M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 31.9B | 31.9B | 36.1B | 36.4B | 61.4B | 64.5B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 275M | 346M | 385M | 2.4B | 670M | 829.8M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 494M | 2.5B | 715M | 463M | 800M | 457.5M | |
Net Receivables | 3.5B | 3.4B | 4.0B | 4.3B | 5.4B | 5.7B | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 37.0B | 38.9B | 42.0B | 55.7B | 69.3B | 72.7B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 21.6B | 22.7B | 22.8B | 36.0B | 50.1B | 52.6B | |
Other Current Assets | 524M | 516M | 497M | 561M | 266M | 288.7M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 1.5B | 1.2B | 1.2B | (192M) | (220.8M) | (209.8M) | |
Total Liab | 27.6B | 29.3B | 31.4B | 45.6B | 58.8B | 61.8B | |
Total Current Assets | 5.1B | 6.9B | 5.8B | 19.3B | 7.8B | 8.2B | |
Intangible Assets | 8.9B | 8.9B | 12.3B | 12.3B | 17.9B | 18.8B | |
Inventory | 460M | 479M | 535M | 438M | 456M | 280.0M | |
Other Assets | 832M | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.6B | 1.8B | 1.9B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 1.5B | 1.2B | 1.2B | (192M) | (1.4B) | (1.3B) | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 224M | 336M | 394M | 400M | 773M | 811.7M | |
Short Term Debt | 2.5B | 2.9B | 4.1B | 5.2B | 3.4B | 1.8B | |
Other Current Liab | 239M | 587M | 722M | 252M | 434M | 255.0M | |
Good Will | 3.9B | 4.0B | 4.0B | 4.0B | 16.3B | 17.1B | |
Other Liab | 4.2B | 4.4B | 4.1B | 4.4B | 5.1B | 2.9B | |
Net Tangible Assets | (3.4B) | (3.3B) | (5.8B) | (6.2B) | (5.6B) | (5.8B) | |
Long Term Debt | 16.0B | 16.8B | 17.1B | 29.9B | 39.8B | 41.7B | |
Long Term Investments | 2.8B | 2.5B | 2.5B | 2.1B | 598M | 568.1M | |
Short Long Term Debt | 2.2B | 2.7B | 3.8B | 4.8B | 2.9B | 2.3B | |
Property Plant Equipment | 13.9B | 14.0B | 14.7B | 15.6B | 17.9B | 12.3B | |
Short Term Investments | 101M | 61M | 120M | 689M | 80M | 76M | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 29M | 1.1B | 565M | 738M | 316M | 397.4M | |
Net Invested Capital | 27.6B | 29.0B | 20.9B | 34.7B | 53.0B | 33.4B | |
Net Working Capital | (847M) | 343M | (2.8B) | 9.7B | (948M) | (900.6M) |
Pair Trading with Rogers Communications
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rogers Communications will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Rogers Stock
0.74 | VISA | Visa Inc CDR | PairCorr |
0.64 | TSLA | Tesla Inc CDR | PairCorr |
0.53 | GOOG | Alphabet CDR | PairCorr |
0.41 | NVDA | NVIDIA CDR | PairCorr |
0.34 | INTC | INTEL CDR | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Rogers Communications could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Rogers Communications when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Rogers Communications - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Rogers Communications to buy it.
The correlation of Rogers Communications is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Rogers Communications moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Rogers Communications moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Rogers Communications can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Rogers Stock Analysis
When running Rogers Communications' price analysis, check to measure Rogers Communications' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Rogers Communications is operating at the current time. Most of Rogers Communications' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Rogers Communications' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Rogers Communications' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Rogers Communications to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.