Red Total Operating Expenses vs Tax Provision Analysis
RRR Stock | USD 50.85 0.82 1.64% |
Red Rock financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Red Rock Resorts prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Red Rock Resorts is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Red Rock Total Operating Expenses and its Tax Provision accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Red Rock Resorts. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area.
Total Operating Expenses vs Tax Provision
Total Operating Expenses vs Tax Provision Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Red Rock Resorts Total Operating Expenses account and Tax Provision. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have weak contrarian relationship.
The correlation between Red Rock's Total Operating Expenses and Tax Provision is -0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Total Operating Expenses that can explain the historical movement of Tax Provision in the same time period over historical financial statements of Red Rock Resorts, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Red Rock's Total Operating Expenses and Tax Provision is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Total Operating Expenses of Red Rock Resorts are associated (or correlated) with its Tax Provision. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Tax Provision has no effect on the direction of Total Operating Expenses i.e., Red Rock's Total Operating Expenses and Tax Provision go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | -0.11 |
Relationship Direction | Negative |
Relationship Strength | Insignificant |
Total Operating Expenses
The total costs associated with the day-to-day operations of a business, excluding the cost of goods sold but including selling, general, and administrative expenses.Tax Provision
The amount set aside by a company to cover any estimated taxes for the current period. It reflects the company's expected tax liabilities.Most indicators from Red Rock's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Red Rock Resorts current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Red Rock Resorts. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. As of 11/25/2024, Selling General Administrative is likely to grow to about 367.4 M, while Discontinued Operations is likely to drop (200.4 K).
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 103.2M | 129.9M | 181.0M | 117.7M | Depreciation And Amortization | 157.8M | 128.4M | 132.5M | 176.3M |
Red Rock fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Red Rock Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Red Rock fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 69.6M | 70.5M | 116.5M | 104.7M | 103.2M | 81.3M | |
Total Assets | 4.1B | 3.7B | 3.1B | 3.3B | 4.0B | 3.8B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 3.0B | 2.9B | 2.9B | 3.0B | 3.3B | 3.0B | |
Other Current Liab | 182.2M | 115.7M | 107.9M | 200.5M | 291.6M | 149.3M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 276.0M | 200.3M | 204.8M | 293.2M | 349.2M | 288.1M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 500.7M | 352.6M | 59.5M | 43.8M | 168.8M | 305.7M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 3.3B | 3.1B | 2.2B | 2.6B | 3.3B | 3.0B | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 22.2M | 11.9M | 15.9M | 18.3M | 20.2M | 39.5M | |
Net Debt | 2.9B | 2.8B | 2.6B | 2.9B | 3.2B | 2.8B | |
Accounts Payable | 34.0M | 11.2M | 17.5M | 11.4M | 25.4M | 17.9M | |
Cash | 128.8M | 121.2M | 275.3M | 117.3M | 137.6M | 163.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 3.8B | 3.5B | 2.7B | 3.1B | 3.7B | 3.6B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 106.1M | 72.5M | 127.3M | 124.9M | 97.1M | 96.2M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 128.8M | 121.2M | 275.3M | 117.3M | 137.6M | 163.3M | |
Net Receivables | 56.7M | 35.1M | 36.7M | 43.6M | 76.4M | 51.7M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 706K | 713K | 615K | 581K | 522.9K | 496.8K | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 4.1B | 3.7B | 3.1B | 3.3B | 4.0B | 3.8B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 3.1B | 2.9B | 2.9B | 3.0B | 3.4B | 3.0B | |
Inventory | 17.8M | 13.1M | 11.7M | 13.2M | 15.3M | 14.0M | |
Other Current Assets | 17.6M | 88.9M | 105.4M | 46.9M | 53.1M | 40.2M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 376.2M | 385.6M | 55.0M | 0.0 | 7.3M | 7.0M | |
Total Liab | 3.3B | 3.1B | 3.1B | 3.3B | 3.7B | 3.3B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 3.3B | 3.1B | 3.4B | 3.8B | 4.5B | 3.4B | |
Total Current Assets | 281.6M | 249.0M | 429.1M | 221.0M | 282.3M | 294.9M | |
Short Term Debt | 37.6M | 25.8M | 28.9M | 30.9M | 32.2M | 37.6M | |
Intangible Assets | 108.5M | 100.8M | 87.2M | 84.4M | 82.8M | 99.1M | |
Common Stock | 706K | 713K | 615K | 581K | 590K | 560.5K | |
Other Liab | 40.4M | 44.9M | 36.0M | 31.9M | 28.7M | 27.3M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 196.5M | 56.1M | 63.3M | (236.3M) | (212.6M) | (202.0M) | |
Other Assets | 444.6M | 336.5M | 391.5M | 618.9M | 711.7M | 381.4M | |
Long Term Debt | 3.0B | 2.9B | 2.8B | 3.0B | 3.3B | 3.0B | |
Deferred Long Term Liab | 18.7M | 22.1M | 34.1M | 41.7M | 47.9M | 50.3M | |
Long Term Investments | 8.9M | 8.9M | 8.2M | 6.1M | 5.5M | 8.7M | |
Short Long Term Debt | 34.0M | 22.8M | 25.9M | 26.1M | 26.1M | 33.8M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 3.1B | 3.1B | 2.2B | 2.6B | 3.0B | 2.9B | |
Retained Earnings | 124.4M | (33.1M) | 3.9M | 43.2M | 160.9M | 168.9M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 3.0B | 2.9B | 2.8B | 3.0B | 3.4B | 3.0B | |
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity | 281.9M | 252.0M | (9.5M) | (11.5M) | (10.4M) | (9.9M) |
Pair Trading with Red Rock
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Red Rock position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Red Rock will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Red Stock
0.73 | EVRI | Everi Holdings | PairCorr |
0.66 | AGS | PlayAGS | PairCorr |
0.66 | EAT | Brinker International | PairCorr |
0.62 | CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
0.61 | PLYA | Playa Hotels Resorts | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Red Rock could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Red Rock when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Red Rock - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Red Rock Resorts to buy it.
The correlation of Red Rock is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Red Rock moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Red Rock Resorts moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Red Rock can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Red Stock Analysis
When running Red Rock's price analysis, check to measure Red Rock's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Red Rock is operating at the current time. Most of Red Rock's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Red Rock's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Red Rock's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Red Rock to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.